Stevens Point News

Main Menu

  • Covid 19
  • Sports
    • Sports News
    • High School Sports Scores
    • Wisconsin Rapids Rafters
  • Crime
  • Arts & Entertainment
  • Opinion
  • Obits
  • Contact
    • Subscribe
  • Classifieds
    • View Ads
    • Place Ads
  • Legal Ads
    • Our Legals
    • Statewide
  • E-Edition
    • Stevens Point City Times

logo

Stevens Point News

  • Covid 19
  • Sports
    • Sports News
    • High School Sports Scores
    • Wisconsin Rapids Rafters
  • Crime
  • Arts & Entertainment
  • Opinion
  • Obits
  • Contact
    • Subscribe
  • Classifieds
    • View Ads
    • Place Ads
  • Legal Ads
    • Our Legals
    • Statewide
  • E-Edition
    • Stevens Point City Times
Community News
Home›Community News›Officials discuss open meeting laws

Officials discuss open meeting laws

By STEVENS POINT NEWS
May 14, 2019
616
0
Share:

By Joe Bachman
Editor

STEVENS POINT — City officials discussed the potential hurdles of open meeting laws on Monday, May 13.

Open meeting laws exist so that members of a governmental body cannot discuss municipality matters when not in an official government session. However, open meeting laws can create difficulty for officials to attend public gatherings and information meetings in that if too many attend, quorum would be met without public notice.

This practice would violate open meeting laws, unless there is notice of a quorum at least 24 hours beforehand.

In a memo penned by District 1 Alderperson Tori Jennings, she outlines her thoughts regarding open meeting laws, and whether or not these are broken if multiple city officials attend non-governmental meetings. At Monday’s Public Protection meeting, Jennings referenced the small number of alderpersons that attended public forums this year, likely as a result of quorum laws.

“I am embarrassed that only two or three alder-people showed up,” said Jennings. “We were told that we can’t be there as a quorum. The public is there probably wondering ‘well where is my alder?’

I think we’re doing a bad job as a city when there is this over-extension and over-interpretation of open meetings law in a way that is twisting it in to be something other than what it’s meant to be.”

City Attorney Logan Beveridge spoke at length regarding the legalities of the open meetings laws. According to Beveridge, the challenge is providing communication to the city clerk ahead of time of all meetings with the potential of quorum.

“The law is clear, the courts have been pretty clear: if you’re gathered together to get information about things within your purview it constitutes transaction of business and that does result in a meeting,” said Beveridge. “Going forward, what we might want to do is just look at what format we’re using for these meetings.”

Beveridge stated that the practice becomes tricky, as the number needed to constitute a meeting is different from what constitutes quorum (two-thirds of the members).

“It sounds like we already have a solution here that’s just going to take more coordination,” said District 2 Alder David Shorr. “We just need to take attendance in advance, or figure out who wants to go to which meetings.”

Mayor Mike Wiza made remarks regarding the discussion of open meetings laws, ultimately in agreement with the city attorney.

“Having a couple alders get together to talk about what they want at the next agenda, or how they want to do things at Kuby’s or Two Harp’s is one thing, but these meetings are much bigger, and I agree, I would love to have all of the alders at these meetings, but our city attorney defends the city,” said Wiza. “He doesn’t defend the individual alders; you have your free will, you choose to do what you want, but he is there to advise you — but ultimately his responsibility is to defend the city should something occur.”

District 9 Alder Polly Dalton summed up her thoughts as the meeting wound down.

“We are responsible for governing our conduct,” said Dalton. “So when we’re at these [public] meetings, obviously, it’s our responsibility to not be discussing things and being aware of what’s going on. So it seems very simple and very standard to be noticing whether or not we are going to a meeting to the city clerk.”

As this was a discussion item, no action was taken.

Tagsopen meeting
Previous Article

City plans to partner with Hull on ...

Next Article

WIAA Softball Division 2-5 Brackets released

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

Related articles More from author

  • Community NewsTop Stories

    City Budget: Is the Sky Still Falling?

    April 30, 2012
    By STEVENS POINT NEWS
  • Community NewsElection 2012

    Actress Tyne Daly Supports Obama on Local Campaign Stop

    August 20, 2012
    By STEVENS POINT NEWS
  • Community NewsOutdoors & Sustainability

    Ciclovia Comes to Point

    September 19, 2012
    By STEVENS POINT NEWS
  • Community News

    Presentation on changes to Portage County Shoreland Zoning Ordinance

    February 21, 2013
    By STEVENS POINT NEWS
  • Community News

    City Releases RFP for Edgewater

    February 21, 2013
    By STEVENS POINT NEWS
  • Community News

    Republican Party of Portage County Elects New Executive Board

    February 22, 2013
    By STEVENS POINT NEWS

Leave a reply Cancel reply

High School Sports

Go to High School Sports

Free SP Newsletter

  • Sports

  • Commentary

  • Amherst hands Warhawks first loss

    By Jacob Heid
    October 2, 2023
  • Backfield carries SPASH to a victorious Homecoming

    By Jacob Heid
    October 2, 2023
  • Nicolet National Bank senior spotlight: Alex Martin, Amherst soccer

    By Jacob Heid
    September 27, 2023
  • SPASH finishes second as team in mid-season race

    By Jacob Heid
    September 27, 2023
  • Lamb, Klismith thrash Newman Catholic with monster performance

    By Jacob Heid
    September 25, 2023
  • Pat Wood

    From the publisher: Christmas and Hanukkah

    By Kris Leonhardt
    December 24, 2022
  • Ice fishing contest Reels in $1,500 for Portage County Literacy Council

    By Taylor Hale
    March 17, 2022
  • Kemmeter Column: County celebrates year after quarantine

    By Taylor Hale
    July 12, 2021
  • Isherwood Column: Great engineering projects two

    By Taylor Hale
    July 11, 2021
  • Shoes News Graphic

    Show Column: Odd Jobs

    By Taylor Hale
    July 9, 2021

About Us


The Portage County Gazette is published every Friday by Multi Media Channels. It is locally-owned, locally-operated and locally-written. Subscriptions are $64 annually, delivered via the U.S. Postal Service.


To subscribe, go www.shopmmclocal.com/product/portage-county-gazette or call 715-258-4360

  • PO Box 408, Waupaca WI 54981
  • (715) 343-8045
  • News editor: [email protected]
Copyright © 2022 Multi Media Channels LLC.
All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied, modified or adapted without the prior written consent of Multi Media Channels LLC.
×